(Reposting with permission of the author)
SARA Duterte has been raising a lot of unnecessary issues about a matter that is not important.
Her reasoning and logic are flawed and should be ignored.
Thus, Bongbong Marcos Jr advised his political allies in Congress not to file an impeachment complaint against his vice president.
Was it a tactical blunder?
Marcos has the momentum to cut down Sara, removing her from power and removing an imminent threat to his political position.
It would appear that way but Marcos did not lift a finger to demolish Sara.
She did it herself, committing blunder after blunder and imploding before the public.
Quietly, BBM defanged her, denying her sources of public funds for her political campaign and exposing her weakness.
Now she can rant all she wants and her blind followers can gather all they want at EDSA Shrine for what?
Does she think she muster popular support to oust Marcos, like what happened in EDSA 1986?
Sara is no Cory Aquino who had advocated a non-violent protest. Sara is a violent woman, like her father.
The Dutertes would not hesitate to kill just to stay in power and Sara said she planned to kill the president.
Even if her followers stay for days, weeks, and months at EDSA Shrine, it will not lead to a regime change.
The main ingredients for a popular uprising are missing.
Ano ba ipinaglalaban? EDSA 1 and 2 are against corruption. Sara’s EDSA is defending corruption. Mali yata.
Morally, mali ang pinaglalaban nila.
Political persecution? Mali din. Mas guilty ang mga Duterte sa dami ng napatay at ipinikulong na walang kasalanan.
Tigilan ang drama at harapin ang mga kasong isinampa.
Sa huli, tama nga si BBM. she is unimportant. She would soon fade away.
