FIRST of all, on behalf of the Manila City Hall Reporters’ Association (MACHRA), I would like to express our sincerest thanks and appreciation to all those who condoled with us and the family of our Vice President and beloved friend, Andi Garcia, on his recent passing.
Andi touched so many lives, and I am certain that for them—and especially for us in MACHRA, which is no ordinary media organization but a family for decades now—his kindness and love will be remembered forever.
We ask for prayers for the eternal repose of his soul.
***
Countless Filipinos have welcomed a move initiated by the young House Majority Leader and Ilocos Norte Representative Ferdinand Alexander “Sandro” Marcos, when he filed a proposed measure seeking the abolition of the burdensome travel tax.
He stated that the travel tax has “outlived its purpose” and, in fact, even impedes the realization of the country’s goals for economic recovery, mobility, and regional competitiveness.
Under his proposed House Bill 7443, Rep. Marcos wants to put an end to the travel tax system and the collection of fixed charges.
Presently, a travel tax of P2,700 is charged to first-class passengers, while P1,620 is imposed on those traveling via economy class. I agree with him when he said that for ordinary Filipino families, this amount is heavy.
What makes Rep. Marcos’ move even more unique is the fact that, historically, the imposition of the travel tax was introduced by his own grandfather, the late President Ferdinand E. Marcos. The young Marcos was quick to point out that at the time, the travel tax was created under a totally different economic context or situation—one that is no longer in keeping with present times.
“Today, it has become an added cost that restricts mobility and weighs heavily on ordinary Filipinos who simply want to travel for work, family, or opportunity,” Rep. Sandro explained.
“When travel becomes more expensive, fewer people move, fewer people spend, and fewer opportunities circulate through the economy. Lowering the cost of travel allows Filipino families to allocate their money where it matters most,” he added.
In the case of our overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), it also adds to their problems. Upon arrival at the airport, they would need to go to the Department of Tourism counter, line up, and wait to be processed. The added time causes stress, as it can take an hour or two, creating fear that they might miss their flight. Such is the common complaint, especially from balikbayans or immigrants, who note that the travel tax booth is usually undermanned, particularly during peak season.
Speaking of Rep. Sandro, I was also impressed by how he handled a question thrown at him during an ambush interview regarding proposals to effect a “no work, no pay” policy among lawmakers.
The question was harsh. He was asked if the move was aimed at Sen. Bato dela Rosa who, as we all know, has not been reporting to the Senate for about six months now, yet continues to draw his salary—which comes from taxpayers’ money.
With a smile and in an ordinary voice devoid of any annoyance, Rep. Sandro retorted, “nag-iintriga ka,” and then denied what clearly came across as a direct accusation.
He was a good sport and managed to maintain his composure and statesmanship despite the apparent attempt to draw his ire.
